Effects of Holding Opposite Political Opinion on the Quality of Marital Relationship and Satisfaction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55737/qjssh.vi-i.25300Keywords:
Opposite Political Opinions, Marital Relationship Satisfaction, Marital Relationship Quality, Political Polarization, Gender Differences in Marital QualityAbstract
This study focuses on the impact of the individuals’ political beliefs on their marital relationships and satisfaction when the two are of opposite opinions. The study used an exploratory sequential research design where two phases were used: A qualitative phase with semi structured interviews from eight married persons (four males and four females) and a quantitative phase that involved a survey of 150 married persons (75 males and 75 females with varying political opinions with regards to their partners). In interviews, key themes were derived through thematic analysis, which consisted of intense political allegiance, political polarization, communication challenge and its effect on marital quality. To quantify the relationships, Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS-32) and the Enrich Marital Satisfaction Scale (EMSS) were used to measure relationship satisfaction. Further, Statistical analyses such as t-tests and ANOVA, revealed that those with opposite political opinion from one’s spouse had lower marital satisfaction and quality, but marital satisfaction remains similar among men and women. But women viewed their marriages as lower in quality compared to men. The more political affiliations were tied to strength, the more associated it was with marital distress. According to the researchers, political differences have the potential to cause a significant amount of conflict and decrease intimacy within relationships, and thus require better relationships strategies when relationships are politically polarized partners.
References
Afifi, W. A., Aldeis, D. A., & Hmielowski, J. D. (2020). Political disagreements in romantic partnerships during the U.S. presidential election: The impact on relationship satisfaction and intimacy. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(2), 244-264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520942295
Baumeister, R. F., & Vohs, K. D. (2007). Marital satisfaction. SAGE Knowledge. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412956253.n276
Bernhold, Q. S., McCarty, D., & Giles, H. (2022). Relationship satisfaction as a function of perceived similarity in religious and political beliefs and identity accommodation. Journal of Family Communication, 22(4), 363-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2022.2069771
Bradbury, T. N., & Karney, B. R. (2014). Understanding and altering the longitudinal course of marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(3), 387-406.
Cowan, S. K., & Baldassarri, D. (2018). “It could turn ugly”: Selective disclosure of attitudes in political discussion networks. Social Networks, 52, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.04.002
Fangmeier, T. L., Stanley, S. M., Knopp, K., & Rhoades, G. K. (2020). Political party identification and romantic relationship quality. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 9(3), 167-180. https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000141
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117-140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
Gottman, J. M. (2015). The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work. Three Rivers Press.
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405-431. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038
Kelley, H. H., LeBaron, A. B., & Hill, E. J. (2018). Financial stress and marital quality: The moderating influence of couple communication. Journal of Financial Therapy, 9(2), 3. https://doi.org/10.4148/1944-9771.1176
Balestrino, A., & Ciardi, C. (2008). Social norms, cognitive dissonance and the timing of marriage. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(6), 2399–2410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2008.05.002
Huber, G. A., & Malhotra, N. (2017). Political homophily in social relationships: Evidence from online dating behavior. The Journal of Politics, 79(1), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1086/687533
Murray, E. (2021). How Differences in Political Ideology Impact Close Relationships [Undergraduate Honors Theses. William & Mary].
Peacock, C., & Pederson, J. R. (2022). Love and politics: The influence of politically (dis)similar romantic relationships on political participation and relationship satisfaction. Human Communication Research, 48(4), 567-578. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqac011
Du Plooy, K., & De Beer, R. (2018). Effective interactions: Communication and high levels of marital satisfaction. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 28(2), 161-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2018.1435041
Sauerheber, J. D., Hughey, A. W., Wolf, C. P., Ginn, B., & Stethen, A. (2021). The relationship among and between marital satisfaction, religious faith, and political orientation. Family Journal (Alexandria, Va.), 29(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480720939023
Van Duyn, E. (2024). Negotiating news: How cross- cutting romantic partners select, consume, and discuss news together. Political Communication, 41(2), 224-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2024.1020349
VanLaningham, J., Johnson, D. R., & Amato, P. (2001). Marital happiness, marital duration, and the U-shaped curve: Evidence from a five-wave panel study. Social Forces, 79(4), 1313-1341. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2001.0055
Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 307-337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.1 63600
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Azka Lodhi, Muhammad Umar Fayyaz, Maryam Noor
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
