Preparing Faculty Resources for Adopting Open Book Exams at a Liberal Art University in Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55737/qjssh.vi-i.25294Keywords:
Open-book Exam, OBE, Community of Practice, CoP, PakistanAbstract
This paper provides insights into the journey of a liberal arts university in Pakistan towards adopting online or remote Open-Book Examination (OBE) as an attempt to shift from conventional examination to foster deeper learning, critical thinking, and knowledge application skills among undergraduate students. This journey encompassed the creation of a twelve-member Community of Practice (CoP) involving diverse stakeholders representing the full spectrum of university community including faculty, students, leadership, and administrative departments. After a series of regulated meetings, the CoP collaboratively developed assistive resources for the faculty to be able to plan for, prepare, and implement OBE. This initiative was housed at the Center for Learning and Teaching (CLT), a hub of pedagogic innovation and excellence. The OBE resources were disseminated to all faculty through the webpage. These resources are available for viewership beyond the institutional community and serve as a guide for faculty in Higher Education willing to adopt the OBE approach. The paper also unpacks some key attributes of OBE and sets a way forward for capacity building in low-resourced institutes.
References
Arnold, K. M., & McDermott, K. B. (2013). Test-potentiated learning: Distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(3), 940–945. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029199
Dawson, P., Nicola‐Richmond, K., & Partridge, H. (2024). Beyond open book versus closed book: a taxonomy of restrictions in online examinations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2209298
Khalid, I. (2023). Limited Access to Education for Out-of-School Children in Pakistan: Exploring Barriers and Suggesting Measures. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 4(4), 290–304. https://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2023(4-IV)29
Kilag, O. K. T., & Sasan, J. M. (2023). Unpacking the Role of Instructional Leadership in Teacher Professional Development. Advanced Qualitative Research, 1(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.31098/aqr.v1i1.1380
Laufer, M., Leiser, A., Deacon, B., Perrin de Brichambaut, P., Fecher, B., Kobsda, C., & Hesse, F. (2021). Digital higher education: a divider or bridge builder? Leadership perspectives on edtech in a COVID-19 reality. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00287-6
Permzadian, V., & Cho, K. W. (2023). Does the format of an assessment (closed book or open book) affect learning? A systematic review of the literature. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2023.2289128
Raza, M. (2022). Interactive radio instruction – a legacy of COVID-19 for marginalized adolescent girls of Baluchistan. Journal for Multicultural Education, 16(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/jme-01-2022-0003
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Wijngaards-de Meij, L., & Merx, S. (2019). Improving curriculum alignment and achieving learning goals by making the curriculum visible. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(3), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144x.2018.1462187
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Mehwish Raza, Dr. Ekaterina Gavrishyk

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.