Case Marking in Pashto Nouns: Word and Paradigm Approach

Authors

  • Naveed Ur Rehman M.Phil. in Applied Linguistics/Lecturer, National University of Modern Languages, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
  • Waqas Ahmad BS Graduate, Department of English and Applied Linguistics, University of Science and Technology, Bannu, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
  • Manaf Ali Shah M.Phil. in Applied Linguistics, Department of English, University of Central Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Dr. Arshad Ali Khan Associate Professor, Department of Linguistics & Communication, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55737/qjssh.v-iv.24278

Keywords:

Case Marking, Pashto Nouns, Marwat Dialect, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Rangri, Language

Abstract

The present study investigates the case marking of nouns in the Marwat dialect of the Pashto language, spoken in many regions of Pakistan and Afghanistan by using the Word-and Paradigm (WP) approach of Haspelmath & Sims (2010). The study attempts to analyze and describe morphological processes of case marking of nouns in the Pashto language. The data was collected from different villages of district Lakki Marwat, located in the south of KPK, in the form of audio recordings of eight willing and preferably old uneducated rural participants. The analysis of the data showed that Pashto nouns shared a number of morphological features with other IA (Indo-Aryan) languages like Rangri vis-à-vis the presence of grammatical gender marking. The data also shows that Pashto nouns are morphologically rich. Nouns carry these case inflections i.e. ergative, nominative, accusative, oblique, and vocative. The study finds the WP approach suitable for the analysis of the morphologically complex Pashto language due to its ability to deal with cumulative, extended, and zero exponents.

Author Biographies

  • Naveed Ur Rehman, M.Phil. in Applied Linguistics/Lecturer, National University of Modern Languages, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
  • Dr. Arshad Ali Khan, Associate Professor, Department of Linguistics & Communication, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.

     

     

References

Abbi, A. (2001). A manual of linguistic fieldwork and structure of Indian languages. Muenchen: Lincom Europa. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130000798251063680

Ahmad, T. (2007). Ablative, Sociative and Instrumental Case Markers in Urdu, Punjabi and Sindhi. Proceedings of Conference of Language and Technology, Peshawar. Yumpu.com. https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/17822659/ablative-sociative-and-instrument

Anderson, S. R. (2003). Clitics: Overview. In W. J. Frawley (Ed.). International Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Bauer, L. (2003). Introducing Linguistic Morphology. (2 nd Ed.). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

Bhatt, R. (2003). Topics in the syntax of the modern Indo-Aryan languages. Passivization Handout). http://web.mit.edu/rbhatt/www/24.956

Blake, B. (2001). Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Blevins, J. P. (2013a). Word-based morphology from Aristotle to modern WP. In K. Allan (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Linguistics. OUP, Ch. 16: 375–396.

Blevins, J. P. (2015b). Words and Paradigms. Oxford University Press.

Bukhari, N. H. (2009). The Syntax of Serial Verbs in Gojri. [PhD Thesis]. Newcastle University, United Kingdom.

Butt, M. (1993). The Structure of Complex Predicates in Urdu. [PhD Thesis]. Stanford University.

Butt, M., & King, T. H. (2004). The Status of Case. In V. Dayal and A. Mahajan (Eds.), Clause Structure in South Asian Languages. (pp. 153-198). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Bybee, J. L. (1985). Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. In Morphology. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Carlson, L. (2005). Inducing a morphological transducer from inflectional paradigms. In A. Arppe, L. Carlson, K. Lindén, J. Piitulainen, M. Suominen, M. Vainio, H. Westerlund & A. Yli-Jyrä (Eds.), Inquires into Words, Constraints and Contexts. 18–24. Saarijärvi, Finland: Gummerus Printing.

Chambers, J. K., & Trudgill, P. (1998). Dialectology (2nd Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

David, A., Maxwell, M., Browne, E., & Lynn, N. (2009). Urdu morphology. Maryland: Centre for Advanced Study of Language, University of Maryland.

De Hoop, H., & Narasimhan, B. (2005). Differential case-marking in Hindi. In Competition and variation in natural languages (pp. 321-345). Elsevier.

Dinakhel, M. A. (2020). Comparison Of Two Dialects Of Pashto, Spoken In Afghanistan And Pakistan: Kandahari Dialect And Yusufzai Dialect. Central Asia, 86(1).

Garcia, M. I. M., & Munir, B. (2016). Origins of the Pashto Language and Phases of its Literary Evolution. Journal of Research in Humanities, 52(01), 1–23. https://jrh.pu.edu.pk/index.php/Journal/article/view/195

Haspelmath, M., & Sims, A. D. (2010). Understanding Morphology. 2nd Ed. London: Hodder Education.

Henderson, M. M. T. (1983). Four Varieties of Pashto. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 103(3), 595–597. https://doi.org/10.2307/602038

Iqbal, M. (2016). The Morphology of Punjabi Nouns: An OT Analysis. [MPhil Thesis. University of Gujrat, Pakistan

Jayan, J., R, R. R., & Rajendran, Dr. S. (2011). Morphological Analyser and Morphological Generator for Malayalam Tamil Machine Translation. International Journal of Computer Applications, 13(8), 15–18. https://doi.org/10.5120/1802-2440

Khan, K. (2011). Pashto Phonology: The Relationship between Syllable Structure and Word Order. [PhD Thesis]. University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarabad.

Khan, A. K., & Zuhra, F. T. (2007). The computational morphology of Pashto noun'. South Asian language review, 17(1).

Leipzig Glossing Rules. (2015). The Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. https://www.eva.mpg.de/index/

Mangrio, R. A. (2016). The Morphology of Loanwords in Urdu: The Persian, Arabic and English Strands. New Castle: Cambridge Scholars Publishers.

Masica, C. P. (1991). The Indo-Aryan Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Matthews, P. H. (1991). Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rahman, T. (2011). Cohesion and Confrontation: the case of the Historiography of Urdu. A paper presented in the 15th language Development Conference, Colombo, Sri Lanka, October 16-19. https://nips.qau.edu.pk/cv/tariq.pdf

Ramaswamy, V. (2011). A Morphological Analyzer for Tamil. [PhD] Thesis. University of Hyderabad, India.

Saad, M. (2014). The description and categorization of word formation processes in Urdu and measuring their productivity. [M.Phil. thesis]. University of Management and Technology, Lahore.

Spencer, A., Butt, M., & King, T. H. (2005, January). Case in Hindi. In Proceedings of the LFG05 Conference (pp. 429-446). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Umar-ud-Din., & Bukhari, N. H. (2017). The Morphological Behaviour of Urdu Pronominal Clitics. Bāzyāft, 31, 3-20. https://pu.edu.pk/images/journal/bazyaft/PDF/01_Eng31_2017.pdf

Zwicky, A. M., & Pullum, G. K. (1983). Cliticization vs. inflection: English n't. Language, 59(3), 502-513. https://doi.org/10.2307/413900

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Rehman, N. U., Ahmad, W., Shah, M. A., & Khan, A. A. (2024). Case Marking in Pashto Nouns: Word and Paradigm Approach. Qlantic Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(4), 323-332. https://doi.org/10.55737/qjssh.v-iv.24278