Empirical Analysis of the Effectiveness of Fiscal and Monetary Policy Tools in Stabilizing Economy: Evidence from Pakistan

Authors

  • Dr. Bushra Pervaiz Assistant Professor/HOD, Department of Economics, Lahore Leads University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8942-9465
  • Dr. Muhammad Qasim Manzoor Assistant Chief, Planning & Development Board, Government of Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan. https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0758-9483
  • Rana Hamza Gull PhD Scholar/Lecturer, Department of Economics, Lahore Leads University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Hafiza Asar Umar M.Phil. Scholar, Department of Economics, Lahore Leads University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55737/qjssh.v-iv.24264

Keywords:

Fiscal Policy, Monetary Policy, Vector Autoregressive Model, Impulse Response Function, Macroeconomic Stability, Pakistan

Abstract

Fiscal and monetary policy plays a vital role in macroeconomic stability. The Keynesians have emphasized the fiscal policy whereas the Monetarists supported interventions under monetary policy. In fact, these policies are interrelated and influence each other. The expansionary fiscal policy overheats the economy and reduce the effectiveness of monetary policy. The use of the appropriate mix of tools under fiscal and monetary policy is of immense importance for economic stability under country specific economic conditions.  Therefore, the instant study was meant to look at the effectiveness of monetary and fiscal policy instruments in stabilization of Pakistan’s economy. The data was collected from secondary sources of Government of Pakistan from 1986 to 2022. The government expenditure was analyzed to be a proxy for fiscal policy whereas money supply for monetary policy. The study employed Impulse Response Function (IRF) and Variance Decomposition (VDC) in Vector Autoregressive (VAR) Model. The findings of IRF confirmed the impact of money supply on economic growth in Pakistan. At first, the money supply affected the GDP negatively but after 3rd year, its impact was changed to be positive and it was rising sharply. It indicated that the expansionary monetary policy was effective in the medium and long run in Pakistan. It was concluded that the fiscal policy appeared to be relatively more effective for its contribution towards economic growth as compared with monetary policy.

References

Adeeb, B., Saeed, S., & Ali, F. (2013). Do Fiscal, monetary and trade policies matter for growth? Empirical evidence from Pakistan (Doctoral dissertation, Dissertation, Mohammad Ali Jinnah University, Islamabad).

Aghion, P., Caroli, E., & García-Peñalosa, C. (1999). Inequality and Economic Growth: The Perspective of the New Growth Theories. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(4), 1615–1660. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.37.4.1615

Andersen, L. C., & Jordan, J. L. (1968). Monetary and Fiscal Actions: A Test of Their Relative Importance in Economic Stabilization. Review, 50, 11–24. https://doi.org/10.20955/r.50.11-24.qox

Arrow, K. J. (2017). Optimal capital policy with irreversible investment. In Value, capital and growth (pp. 1-20). Routledge.

Atif, M., Shahab, S., & Mahmood, M. T. (2012). The nexus between economic growth, investment and taxes: Empirical evidence from Pakistan. Academic Research International, 3(2), 530-537. http://www.savap.org.pk/journals/ARInt./Vol.3(2)/2012(3.2-66).pdf

Blanchard, O., & Perotti, R. (2002). An Empirical Characterization of the Dynamic Effects of Changes in Government Spending and Taxes on Output. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1329–1368. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302320935043

Caballero, R. J. (1991). On the Sign of the Investment-Uncertainty Relationship. The American Economic Review, 81(1), 279–288. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2006800

CHAUDHARY, M. A., & SHABBIR, G. (2005). MACROECONOMIC IMPACTS OF BUDGET DEFICIT ON PAKISTAN’S FOREIGN SECTOR. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 43(2), 185–198. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25825272

Chowdhury, L. S., & Afzal, M. N. I. (2015). The Effectiveness of Monetary Policy and Fiscal Policy in Bangladesh. Journal of Applied Business & Economics, 17(1). http://www.na-businesspress.com/JABE/ChowdhuryLS_Web17_1_.pdf

Fatas, A., & Mihov, I. (2003). The Case for Restricting Fiscal Policy Discretion. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4), 1419–1447. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303322552838

Friedman, B. M. (2008). Why a Dual Mandate is Right for Monetary Policy*. International Finance, 11(2), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2362.2008.01220.x

Government of Pakistan (2023). Economic Survey of Pakistan (Various issues), Finance Division, Islamabad.

Government of Pakistan (2023). National Accounts, Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Planning, Development and Special Initiative, Islamabad.

Ivanov, V., & Kilian, L. (2005). A Practitioner’s Guide to Lag Order Selection For VAR Impulse Response Analysis. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1558-3708.1219

Jawaid, S. T., Arif, I., & Naeemullah, S. M. (2010). Comparative analysis of monetary and fiscal policy: A case study of Pakistan. Nice Research Journal , 3(1), 58-67. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/30850

Keran, M. W. (1969). Monetary and Fiscal Influences on Economic Activity—The Historical Evidence. Review, 51, 5–24. https://doi.org/10.20955/r.51.5-24.atu

Kneller, R., Bleaney, M. F., & Gemmell, N. (1999). Fiscal policy and growth: evidence from OECD countries. Journal of Public Economics, 74(2), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0047-2727(99)00022-5

Lucas, R. E. (1972). Expectations and the neutrality of money. Journal of Economic Theory, 4(2), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(72)90142-1

MacKinnon, J. G. (2010). Critical values for cointegration tests (No. 1227). Queen's Economics Department Working Paper, 1-17

Mankiw, N. G. (Ed.). (2007). Monetary policy. National Bureau of Economics Research Studies in Business Cycles, Vol – 29, University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.

Mishkin, F. S. (1996). Understanding financial crises: a developing country perspective. Working Paper Series, National Bureau of Economic Research, Massachusetts. https://doi.org/10.3386/w5600

Mountford, A., & Uhlig, H. (2009). What are the effects of fiscal policy shocks? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 24(6), 960–992. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.1079

Olaloye, A. O., & Ikhide, S. I. (1995). Economic sustainability and the role of fiscal and monetary policies in a depressed economy: The case of Nigeria. Sustainable Development, 3(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3460030206

Pastor, L., & Veronesi, P. (2012). Uncertainty about Government Policy and Stock Prices. The Journal of Finance, 67(4), 1219–1264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01746.x

Rakić, B., & Rađenović, T. (2013). The Effectiveness of Monetary and Fiscal Policy in Serbia. Industrija, 41(2). https://doi.org/10.5937/industrija41-4011

Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica, 48(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912017

State Bank of Pakistan (1956). The State Bank of Pakistan Act, 1956, Government of Pakistan. https://www.sbp.org.pk/about/act/SBP-Act.pdf

Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2001). Vector Autoregressions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.4.101

Teigen, R. L. (1975). Monetary and Fiscal Influences on Economic Activity: Evidence from Denmark, Finland and Norway. The Swedish Journal of Economics, 77(2), 149. https://doi.org/10.2307/3438913

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Pervaiz, B., Manzoor, M. Q., Gull, R. H., & Umar, H. A. (2024). Empirical Analysis of the Effectiveness of Fiscal and Monetary Policy Tools in Stabilizing Economy: Evidence from Pakistan. Qlantic Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(4), 248-257. https://doi.org/10.55737/qjssh.v-iv.24264